30% Of Bags In Guangzhou Spot Check Are Unqualified

Consumers who like to buy bags should pay attention. Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Quality Supervision announced that many batches of daily products such as handbags were sampled for inspection. Thirteen batches of bags were exposed to be unqualified, and the problem bags may easily crack and fade in use, affecting the use.

The reporter learned that in the spot check on the quality of handbag products in the production field of Guangzhou by the Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Quality Supervision, 13 of 41 batches of products were unqualified, the unqualified rate was 31%, and 30% of bags were unqualified.

It is understood that some of the unqualified products Famous brand On the "black list", Guangzhou Dixun Handbag products The vibration impact performance of the "Guirenniao" satchel produced by the company is unqualified; "Yige" produced by Guangzhou Yizhige Leather Co., Ltd The color fastness of "EAGOL" Japanese character bag to rubbing is unacceptable; The "AODASI Otas" leisure backpack produced by Guangzhou Otas Leather Co., Ltd. is unqualified.

　　 Guangzhou The relevant person in charge of the Municipal Bureau of Quality Supervision said that the random inspection found that the vibration impact performance of 10 batches of products was unqualified, which may lead to quality problems such as cracking. For one item of rubbing color fastness, 4 batches of products are unqualified.

Related links:

The first footwear standard drafting work conference was held in Dongguan, Guangdong, and more than 30 people from many research institutions, enterprises, quality inspection institutions, and local industry associations from Beijing, Shandong, Shanghai, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, etc. attended the conference. The meeting was hosted by the Secretariat of the National Technical Committee for Shoe Standardization and undertaken by Dongguan Xinhuwei Industrial Co., Ltd. At the same time, the meeting was valued and supported by Guangdong Institute of Standardization and Dongguan Quality Inspection Bureau. Relevant leaders attended the meeting and wished the drafting meeting a complete success.

Before the discussion on the draft of relevant standards, Secretary General Qi Xiaoxia made a detailed introduction from the three levels of standardization reform, the focus of footwear standards work, and the specific work deployment of the Secretariat in the future, and reported the resolution of the meeting on the classification and naming of shoes at the expanded meeting of the Director of the Footwear Standards Committee in March 2015, It is also pointed out that the future work of the Shoe Standards Committee will focus on the direction of standardization reform, solve the problem of duplication or overlapping of some standards in the domestic footwear industry, and constantly improve the footwear standard system. Then the secretary of the Footwear Standards Committee briefly introduced the existing footwear standard system and the relevant knowledge of the standard project establishment, formulation and revision procedures to the participants, so that they could have a better understanding of China's footwear standardization work and standard formulation and revision procedures.

The meeting passed the following resolutions: Casual Shoes, Footwear Outsoles, Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Determination of Chemical Test Methods for Footwear, Determination of Formamide, Footwear Limited substances present in footwear and footwear components Determination of Dimethylformamide ", a total of five draft national and industrial standards were discussed, and the preparation principles, application scope and normative elements of each standard were determined. In combination with industry demand and enterprise production practice, experts carefully discussed and deliberated on the determination of assessment items and indicators, selection of test methods, optimization of test parameters and other contents in the technical requirements, and put forward specific opinions and suggestions on the technical route to be tested and verified, the test data to be supplemented and improved, and the technical requirements involved. At the meeting, the Secretariat also signed contracts with the drafting units on the progress of standard preparation and revision and the division of labor in tests.

After the meeting, the Secretariat will organize the drafting group to draw up the validation test scheme, collect samples and carry out validation tests according to the discussion results of the meeting, so as to make the technical indicators of the standard scientific and reasonable, improve the quality of standard preparation and the applicability of the standard.